Our assessment provides an evidence-based view of the dependencies surrounding your critical services and how they affect your ability to operate, recover, move or replace them.
See where material dependencies exist across the whole service.
Understand which dependencies genuinely constrain your options.
Focus investment where greater control creates meaningful value.
A migration plan that has never been tested is not the same as portability.
We help organisations validate critical services through migration, recovery and failover testing, data rehydration, supplier validation and portability monitoring.
Understand where dependency creates material risk and where greater control will create value.
We assess your critical services across technology, data, operations, security, people, commercial arrangements, contracts and jurisdiction to establish your true portability position.
Identify and score material dependencies across the whole critical service.
Understand what could constrain your ability to operate, recover, move or replace the service.
Identify the dependencies and conditions that could require intervention or restrict your options.
Focus investment and remediation where dependency creates the greatest material risk.
Define where greater control matters, what level of dependency is acceptable and where portability should be prioritised.
We connect sovereignty decisions to service criticality, organisational risk appetite and realistic technology and commercial options.
Establish clear principles for control, dependency and portability across critical services.
Determine where greater sovereignty will deliver the greatest strategic and operational value.
Define acceptable levels of dependency based on service criticality and business impact.
Create a prioritised path from your current dependency position towards greater control and choice.
Reduce the dependencies that restrict your options and build greater portability into critical services.
Our multidisciplinary teams address technical, data, operational, security and commercial constraints without introducing unnecessary complexity.
Reduce reliance on proprietary platforms, services and architecture patterns where appropriate.
Design for credible movement of applications and data across environments.
Reduce dependency across tooling, processes, identity, skills and operational capabilities.
Address licensing, contractual and supplier constraints that can limit strategic choice.
Don't assume your critical services are portable. Prove it.
We test whether services can genuinely move, recover or operate under changed conditions and help maintain that capability as technologies and suppliers evolve.
Test migration, recovery and exit runbooks under realistic conditions.
Validate whether critical data and services can be restored or transitioned as expected.
Test whether external dependencies support your required portability and resilience outcomes.
Track dependency, risk and portability over time through measurable indicators and reassessment.
Explore how UBDS Digital has helped other organisations improve business outcomes through data, cybersecurity, cloud and transformation projects.
Digital sovereignty is the ability to maintain appropriate control over critical digital services, data and technology choices.
It does not mean eliminating every dependency. It means understanding which dependencies matter and ensuring you have credible options when circumstances change.
Cloud portability often focuses on moving workloads between technical environments.
Service portability considers the whole service, including technology, data, operations, security, people, commercial arrangements, contracts and jurisdiction.
A workload may be technically movable while the wider service remains effectively constrained.
Not necessarily.
For many organisations, hyperscalers remain the right choice. The objective is to determine where dependency is acceptable and where greater control, resilience or portability creates genuine value.
Not by default.
Multi-cloud can increase flexibility in some situations, but it can also introduce additional complexity and cost. The right approach depends on the criticality of the service, the dependencies involved and the level of control required.
We assess dependency across eight dimensions:
Technology, Data, Operations, Security, People, Commercial, Contracts and Jurisdiction.
The result is an evidence-based view of where dependency creates material risk and what can be done about it.
Typical outputs include:
Start with services where disruption, supplier change or loss of access would create the greatest operational, strategic or regulatory impact.
The aim is not to assess everything at once, but to focus effort where dependency matters most.
Portability should be demonstrated, not assumed.
That can involve testing migration and recovery plans, data extraction and rehydration, failover arrangements, supplier exit processes and other critical dependencies under realistic conditions.
No.
Technology is only one part of the problem. Commercial commitments, contracts, operating models, specialist skills, identity dependencies and jurisdiction can all restrict an organisation's options even when the underlying technology is technically portable.
Greater strategic choice.
A mature sovereignty position means knowing where your critical dependencies sit, understanding which ones you are willing to accept and maintaining realistic options to move, recover or replace services when required.
Speak with one of our Digital Sovereignty experts about your critical services, current dependencies and where greater control or portability may be needed.
In an initial conversation, we can explore:
No assumptions. No one-size-fits-all solution. Just a practical conversation about where you are today and where greater control matters.