The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman needed to better understand systemic issues and regional differences across the populations and communities it serves.
While the organisation held rich internal casework data, including demographic and geographic information, it lacked a clear population benchmark and visibility of wider external trends. As a result, it could see internal volumes and patterns but could not confidently answer critical questions such as:
For example, if 30% of cases came from people aged over 65, was that high? Without knowing whether over-65s made up 15% or 35% of the population, leadership could not assess whether this reflected over-representation, under-representation, or normal variation.
More importantly, this context strengthens the organisation’s ability to identify and evidence potential systemic barriers to access. If certain ethnic groups, disabled people, or other protected communities were under-represented, this could indicate that those groups were not reaching the service, rather than not experiencing issues. Equally, over-representation could signal underlying systemic challenges requiring further investigation.
UBDS Digital partnered with the organisation as a cross-functional rainbow team to design and implement a geo-demographic insight platform that anchored service usage to population context from open datasets from ONS, MHCLG and others.
The solution was delivered iteratively using an Agile approach. The initial phase established the core product capability, including the demographics insight tool, statistical significance framework, and reusable data foundation. A second phase onboarded two new datasets for deprivation and community group context, regional exploration and benchmarking, and executive insight summaries.
In parallel, we conducted a structured research exercise, engaging with over 40 organisations to understand the wider external data landscape, including sensitive and restricted data. This informed a practical roadmap for integrating additional datasets and expanding analytical capability over time.
The organisation lacked the contextual data and statistical framework needed to understand what ‘normal’ looked like compared to the wider population and to confidently identify where systemic or access issues may exist.
1. Volume Without Population Context
The organisation could see how many cases were received by age, ethnicity, disability status, or geography, but could not determine whether those numbers were higher or lower than expected given the underlying population profile.
For example, if one region generated 5,000 cases, that might appear significant. However, if that region accounts for a large share of the national population, the volume may simply reflect scale rather than disproportionate demand.
Without comparing their data to the wider population, it was difficult to determine whether services were being accessed equitably, or whether certain groups were not reaching the service at all.
2. Complex Geography
The organisation needed to analyse patterns across multiple geographic systems, including NHS geographies, counties and regions, parliamentary constituencies, and postcode-level searches.
However, these boundary systems do not align neatly.
For example, an ICB boundary may overlap multiple parliamentary constituencies. Deprivation data may be available at Lower Super Output Area level, while casework data may be recorded at postcode level.
Without a consistent approach, comparisons risked being misleading, limiting confidence in identifying geographic patterns or targeting interventions effectively.
3. Risk of Over-Interpretation
Most requests for interpreting data had to involve a small number of experts. Users did not have a simple statistical framework to determine whether differences were meaningful.
Without statistical safeguards:
This created a risk that perceived differences, particularly for smaller or minority groups, could either be over-interpreted or overlooked entirely.
4. Integrating External Data at Scale
While valuable open datasets existed, onboarding them in a robust and sustainable way was a challenge. Datasets varied in format, granularity, quality, and governance requirements.
UBDS Digital designed and implemented a scalable geo-demographic platform anchored to authoritative population data and robust statistical methodology.
Solution Components
Leadership now has a clear, evidence-based view of who is and is not reaching the service.
This enables the organisation to:
Clearer Strategic Decision-Making
The organisation can:
Improved Confidence and Transparency
Users can confidently interpret results, supported by clear statistical tiering that distinguishes signal from noise.
Better Alignment of Resources
By anchoring service data to population context, the organisation can align outreach and engagement efforts more effectively and support resourcing decisions with objective evidence.
A Scalable Foundation for Future Growth
The organisation now has:
This provides a model for other public sector organisations seeking to understand who their services are reaching, who they are not, and where systemic inequalities may exist, using data in a defensible and scalable way.
Explore our success stories and see how UBDS has transformed Cloud Platform challenges into opportunities for organisations like yours.